(She is probably right!).
the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee hoped that some agreement could be reached with the White House and his committee could hear testimony when Congress returns from its summer recess in September, saying he hopes the White House will accept this decision and finally.
And claims of executive privilege by the President of the United States to gratis werbegeschenke für kinder disallow his top aides to testify on Capitol Hill could prove devastating to his own political party.
But either this fall, or even before, all of that is almost certain to dramatically change.Los Angeles Times first reported, the White House has decided there is no room for compromise.In the past, the Supreme Court had reserved claims by Presidents of absolute immunity only for very movie park gutschein ausdrucken narrow circumstances such as for issues of national security or foreign affairs.Also what might not be a good omen for what might be in that report is that a federal grand jury is reportedly considering criminal charges against one former senior Bush administration appointee in the Civil Rights Division, Bradley Schlozman.Vergesst auch nicht den Videobereich durchzustöbern und die Angebote zu Assassins Creed Embers und Ascendance durchzusehen.Attorneys or much anything else until sometime next year.The motto of this blog: We blog, you decide.Inasmuch as Bates was appointed to the bench by President Bush in 2001 and once worked for Whitewater Special Prosecutor Kenneth.Congress but parties to a small claims court.Update: My friend Marcy Wheeler disagrees. .
And so for that high minded editorial reason, I am not going to offer an opinion as to whether the White House has delayed testimony on the.S.Add to that that a potential prosecution of Bradley Schlozman, or more disclosures about what the federal grand jury probing Schlozman has been uncovering, and the political damage could reach a crescendo.Besides the report on the.S.Starr, he has impeccable conservative credentials.Bates went on to say that he doubted very much that if the White House appealed his decision, they had even a remote possibility of prevailing: The aspect of this lawsuit that is unprecedented is the notion that former White House Counsel Harriett Miers one.
(Uh oh, I hope I am not served with legal papers by Fox News in the morning!).
In the end, the Presidents continuing claim of executive privilege whether made for high minded reasons of constitutional law, obstinacy, or for political calculation could prove to be a last unwanted legacy that George Bush leaves behind for his own political party.
Attorney firings until after the election because of high minded principles (what the White House says) or to conceal their own wrongdoing (what Democrats say) and to help the McCain campaign by assuring that there are politically embarrassing hearing only a couple of months.